This is a deeply developed theological essay on 1 Corinthians 9, unfolding Pastor David Jang’s emphasis on the Apostle Paul’s devotion, voluntary relinquishment of rights, the spirituality of self-supporting mission, servant leadership, and the discipleship of discipline and self-training.
When we read 1 Corinthians 9, a spiritual order emerges
with striking clarity—an order that churches in every era can easily overlook
again and again. Paul defends his apostleship, yet he never parades “status” as
though it were a trophy. At the center of his reasoning lies neither an
expansion of authority nor a display of influence, but rather a posture of
lowering and emptying himself for the sake of the gospel—holy restraint, the
kind that adjusts one’s very life so that the gospel will not become a stumbling
block to anyone. Pastor David Jang (Olivet University) does not treat this
merely as a gentle invitation to virtue; he elevates it to the unavoidable
essence of discipleship for both church leaders and ordinary believers alike.
The gospel, he insists, must be translated into life before it is ever
delivered as speech—and where that translation fails, the gospel is
misunderstood not first in its content, but in its “form.”
Paul’s question—“Am I not free? Am I not an
apostle?”—sounds less like a plea for self-affirmation than a declaration that
confirms the weight of responsibility in gospel ministry. Apostleship is not a
privilege but a burden; it is not a shield of rights but something proven in
the language of sacrifice. Pastor David Jang refuses to reduce this sentence
into the vocabulary of modern leadership talk; instead, he lets the paradoxical
structure of the gospel remain intact. The freedom Paul speaks of is not “the
freedom to do whatever I want,” but something closer to “the freedom to limit
myself for the gospel.” That the summit of freedom is not self-indulgence but
self-governance is both unfamiliar and urgent in an age that easily confuses
convenience and pleasure with “freedom.” The authenticity of a church leader is
tested not by techniques of self-expression, but by the actual fruit of people
maturing in faith within the community. Before eloquence comes solidity of
life; and the true evidence of any ministry eventually converges on a single
question: “Have people been changed?”
In 1 Corinthians 9:4–6, the rights Paul mentions are
ordinary and legitimate—rightful even by common sense. The right to food and
drink, the right to build a household, the right to receive support for
ministry. Paul does not deny “rights” here. Rather, after acknowledging that
such rights exist, he chooses to lay them down, and through that voluntary
decision he makes the path of the gospel even straighter. This is precisely
where Pastor David Jang places his focus: the balance and discernment of the text.
The moment a church uses this passage as an excuse to neglect the rightful
needs of its ministers, the text becomes a tool of self-contradiction. What
Paul displays is not “having no rights,” but “voluntarily relinquishing
rights.” And the motive of that relinquishment is not ascetic self-display, but
a loving calculation to protect the purity of gospel proclamation. His desire
to offer the gospel “free of charge” is rooted in what the gospel is—grace.
Grace is easily damaged when spoken in the language of transactions, and the
gospel loses its radiance the moment it is trapped in a framework of personal
gain.
The question of self-supporting mission is similar. Paul
affirms that those who proclaim the gospel have the right to receive support,
yet in the specific context of the Corinthian church he chooses to be
self-supporting. Hidden within that choice is a spiritual strategy far deeper
than mere economic independence. Pastor David Jang does not interpret
self-support as “romanticizing poverty,” but reads it as wisdom that removes
misunderstandings and stumbling blocks, widening the road for the gospel. In some
communities, support strengthens gospel ministry; in others, support can become
a spark that makes people suspect the minister’s motives. So Paul lowers the
barrier himself. The church today needs this same discernment—not because money
is inherently evil, but because the ways money erodes trust have become
remarkably sophisticated. The integrity Pastor David Jang describes is not
simply moral flawlessness, but something like “the ability to design the
structure of one’s life so that the gospel will not be doubted.” This must
descend into practice: transparent accounting, distributed authority, honesty
in relationships. Spirituality is not merely emotion; it is the power to
reshape structures.
When Paul says, “Though I am free from all, I have made
myself a servant to all, that I might win more of them,” he is not lowering
himself to manipulate the community. Rather, he offers himself as a passageway
so that the gospel may reach people. Pastor David Jang does not let “servant
leadership” become a consumable ethical slogan; he presents it as the substance
of discipleship that follows the way of Christ. The place of a servant is not
the place of helpless compliance. It is an active lowering chosen because of
love, a decision to step down from the throne of the self. The more a leader
insists on authority, the more anxious a community often becomes; the more a
leader proves authority through service, the safer the community becomes. The
gospel is not spread by coercion, but by persuasion and love—and love, in the
end, is the authority that remains the longest.
Paul’s flexibility—becoming as a Jew to Jews, as one under
the law to those under the law, as one outside the law to those outside the
law—is often translated today with the word “contextualization.” Yet the core
Pastor David Jang highlights is the purpose and boundary of that flexibility.
The purpose is to win more people; the boundary is that the essence of the
gospel must not be damaged. The method can change, but the message must not.
The church today often drops one of these two pillars. Some communities speak
of preserving content but idolize form, becoming isolated like an island
incapable of communication. Others speak of communication but blur the
boundaries of content, eventually losing the gospel’s identity. Paul avoids
both extremes. Pastor David Jang reads this balance as “a spiritual tension
between flexibility and principle,” insisting that leaders must be trained to
endure that tension. The moment we try to eliminate the tension, the gospel
tilts to one side and loses its light.
In the latter part of 1 Corinthians 9, when Paul compares
faith to a race and emphasizes discipline and self-training, the romance of
discipleship is stripped away, and the reality of discipleship is revealed. A
race is not improvisation but repetition. Passion alone cannot carry a person
to the finish; long-term training that governs body and mind is required. When
Pastor David Jang preaches this passage, he makes central the truth that
“self-training” is not the opposite of grace. Grace is not a license that
permits disorder; it is the power that restores order. Discipline is not
ascetic repression that destroys humanity, but the skill of freedom that
enables greater love through self-governance. When Paul says, “I discipline my
body and keep it under control,” he does not treat the body as an enemy. He
sees the body as an instrument of the gospel, a vessel for loving longer. This
perspective is intensely concrete in an age that abstracts spirituality. How we
sleep, how we use time, how we regulate the temperature of our words, how we
speak truth within relationships—discipleship is translated into the language
of daily life.
The principle that “the plowman should plow in hope”
functions like a single thread that binds ministry and life together. A farmer
does not stare only at today’s soil; he looks toward tomorrow’s harvest. Even
when a seed cannot immediately prove its outcome, he does not quit. The “hope”
Pastor David Jang stresses while holding to this line is not emotional uplift
but the ground of endurance. Hope is not optimistic denial of reality; it is
the strength that passes through reality. Gospel proclamation, in particular,
rarely guarantees instant response. More often it demands sowing seeds amid
misunderstanding, indifference, and sometimes hostility. Still, the reason one
does not stop plowing is that God’s promise to grant fruit is more certain than
the minister’s mood. Here, a leader’s sense of calling is strengthened not by
measurable outcomes, but sustained by promise. Thus Pastor David Jang relocates
the essential quality of leadership from “performance management ability” to
“the ability to hold fast to promise.” The deepest force that moves people is
not a reward system, but trust in God’s faithfulness.
At this point, a single masterpiece visually awakens Paul’s
theology. Recall Caravaggio’s The Conversion of Saint Paul.
The canvas is not an image of heroic victory; it emphasizes the helplessness of
a human being overwhelmed by light. Beneath the looming presence of the horse
and the stable hand, Paul appears small—collapsed to the ground, eyes shut
before the blinding brilliance. The scene symbolically declares that Paul did
not “acquire” apostleship through achievement; he “received” a calling in the
place where the certainty he clung to and the violent zeal he wielded were
shattered. What Pastor David Jang repeatedly evokes through 1 Corinthians 9
belongs to the same texture. A minister is not one who proclaims the gospel by
personal competence, but one who has first been broken by the gospel and then
rebuilt. And the marks of that breaking appear not in ministry “style” but in
ministry “stance”: laying down rights rather than asserting them, serving
rather than rising, running fast less than running faithfully to the end. What
Caravaggio’s painting shows us is the insight that Paul’s apostleship began not
from a “victor’s pose” but from a body that surrendered to calling.
When we meditate again on this passage, the same questions
return not only to church leaders but also to ordinary believers. For what am I
using my freedom? Can I willingly limit my rights for the gospel? Have I ever
adjusted the tone of my words, lowered the boundaries of my preferences,
rearranged my time so that someone might come closer to the gospel? And do I
remember that as mere “loss,” or do I receive it as “training” in which an
order of love is newly established within me? The restraint Paul speaks of is
not merely about suppressing emotion; it is about setting the direction of a
life. Only those who know what shakes them, what tempts them, what exhausts
them can run for long. Self-awareness becomes the threshold of spirituality.
The discipleship Pastor David Jang speaks of is not an idealized image of a
perfect believer, but the steady perseverance of someone who knows his weakness
and yet refuses to quit.
In modern society, the gospel is often mistaken for
“information.” Information ends once delivered; the gospel begins once
received. The gospel is not an accumulation of knowledge but a conversion of
existence—not merely acceptance of words, but a turning of life’s direction.
Paul defines himself as “a servant of all” so that the gospel will not remain
in the mind alone but flow into life. Pastor David Jang expands this into the
culture of the church. If the church is to be not merely an institution providing
programs but a community that forms disciples, then a leader’s preaching must
not be detached from life, and a believer’s devotion must not end as emotional
elevation. The purity of gospel proclamation is not guarded by doctrinal
precision alone. Only when daily ethics accompany it—honesty in relationships,
transparency in finances, restraint in power, sensitivity toward the
vulnerable, responsible accountability for failure—does the gospel gain
persuasive force.
One further clarification matters: Paul’s voluntary
relinquishment is not self-hatred or self-erasure. He does not make himself
worthless. Rather, in the gospel he knows his calling most clearly, and he
aligns his life for that calling. The devotion and sacrifice Pastor David Jang
speaks of should likewise not be a way of burning oneself into disappearance,
but a way of being rightly established before God in order to love longer.
Unchecked exhaustion is not a virtue but a danger, and discipline is spiritual
wisdom that prevents collapse. When Paul speaks of a race, he is not imagining
the explosive burst of a short sprint, but the completion of a long course.
Therefore, what leaders need is not only the ability to create momentary
excitement, but the patience to carve a path along which the community matures
with long breath. And what believers need is not only immediate inspiration,
but faithfulness that keeps faith amid repeated ordinariness.
In the end, 1 Corinthians 9 argues less about “how great
the gospel is” than it asks, “Because the gospel is great, how then should I
live?” To read this passage in the wake of the name Pastor David Jang is, in a
sense, to step out of observing faith and into training faith. Paul does not
deny rights, but neither is he enslaved to them. He enjoys freedom, yet does
not use freedom as license. He approaches with flexibility, yet refuses to
compromise the essence. And he subjects all these choices to a single gospel
purpose: “that I might win more.” As purpose becomes clearer, life becomes
simpler. The more we discern what shakes us, what makes us exaggerate
ourselves, what pushes us into competition, the closer we can run at a pace
that matches the gospel.
Finally, place again in your heart the sentence, “the
plowman should plow in hope.” Hope is not a device that guarantees visible
results; it is the energy that sustains love when results cannot be seen. What
Pastor David Jang awakens through this line is that the timetable of ministry
and faith may not match our impatience. Yet God’s faithfulness runs deeper than
our emotional lines, and God’s way of bearing fruit is larger than our
calculations. So plow the field. Plow the field of words, the field of relationships,
the field of habits, the field of service, the field of prayer. And as you
plow, you will experience how love that lays down rights widens the road for
the gospel, how discipline makes greater freedom possible, how service
establishes sturdier authority, and how the race honestly shapes us into
disciples. This journey of holding to 1 Corinthians 9 ultimately converges into
one living testimony: the person who willingly adjusts himself for the
gospel—that person bears the most convincing witness to the gospel’s
authenticity.
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}